Business

| Submit CommentSubmit Comments | View Comments(6)
FIGHT: Angie Robinson
FIGHT: Angie Robinson
advertisement

Business leaders pledge to fight back


21/ 7/2004

FURIOUS business leaders today pledged to fight the government's "desperate and outrageous" move to withdraw funding for the Metrolink extension.

As the dust settled on Transport Secretary Alistair Darling's shock announcement, those in the Manchester business community vowed not to give up without a scrap.

Angie Robinson, chief executive of Manchester Chamber of Commerce, said: "It is a desperate and outrageous situation, we can hardly believe it.

"The business community is up in arms, we shall be campaigning harder than ever.

"I don't like banging on about the north-south divide but it seems clear that the south east is going to gain from our losses, with the Crossrail project - from east to west London - costing '10bn.

M.E.N.

"We fought before the Commonwealth Games to get the line to the stadium finished and that didn't happen because of the government's dithering. We are determined to continue campaigning for the Metrolink, and the Chamber is wholly behind the M.E.N. campaign.

"It is worse than snatching sweets from children. Our city will grind to a halt unless we have some proper alleviations within the next few years. I think that after this the business community will go absolutely mad if congestion charging is now introduced without the Metrolink extension."

Damian Waters, regional director of Confederation of British Industry in the north west, accused the government of "dodging the issue" in the hope that someone else would pick up the bill.

"It was a day of contradiction, with the government talking in the morning about plans to reduce congestion and then, in the afternoon, withdrawing a scheme that would do just that."

Mr Waters' said increased congestion on the roads around Greater Manchester would hit the local economy.

"As congestion gets worse the economy will get bogged down.

"Schemes like the Metrolink help cut congestion and we would expect the government to be supporting them."

John Barnacle, chief executive of pro.manchester, which represents the city's legal, accountancy, banking and insurance professionals, described the decision as "a significant blow".

"The Metrolink has clearly been a success. If we intend to continue expanding the city and employment opportunities in it, then it creates serious issues about ease of commuting, quality of life and so on for the whole of the business community."

Paul Henly

Paul Henly, regional policy manager for the Federation of Small Businesses said: "This government has seen fit to reap billions of pounds in revenue from fuel tax but does not seem prepared to use this to invest in public transport in the regions.

"It is a completely backward step which the Federation of Small Businesses deplores. Public transport needs continual investment to improve networks and this `Big Bang' extension would have benefited businesses and communities which cannot afford to be based in Manchester but need access to the city centre."

Tom Russell, chief executive of New East Manchester - one of the areas which would have benefited from the expansion - said: "This is deeply disappointing and is completely at odds with the commitment previously shownto Metrolink by the Department for Transport."

Neil Fountain, chief executive of Manchester Investment and Development Agency Service said: "We are very disappointed at the announcement.

"MIDAS will be supporting the work of the local authorities and as they continue to press for the expansion of the Metrolink."
| Submit CommentSubmit Comments | View CommentsView Comments(6)


Most recent 2 of 6 user comments

   I noticed a piece on the Leeds Today website the MP John Battle (Lab, Leeds West) said the Leeds Supertram was rejected because the plan wasn't ambitious enough and should have been expanded to include a route through the west of the city to Bradford, linking West Yorkshire's two biggest cities. So if this snippet of information holds, then the Big Bang of Manchester's Metrolink, big as it was, wasn't ambitious enough, and lines should have been built to places like Bolton, Wigan and Glossop, as well as all the other Greater Manchester towns. Yes, it is time the neglected North had something. We are fed up to the back teeth of the cossetted South East getting everything, whilst the rest of us fight over the crumbs which fall from the table. Crossrail has made us very cross indeed, and is the latest in a series of kicks in the teeth for the North. Is there little wonder we have been rendered toothless? London has a massive Underground system. It has the Croydon Tramlink, the Docklands Light Railway, both of which have been given the green light for extension, and will get many more links if the London Transport map of 2016 is anything to go by. But however badly you think the Greater Manchester area has been treated over the last 25 years or so by successive Governments, mainly Tory, it has been nothing compared with the shabby treatment and wanton neglect which South Yorkshire has had to endure. Yes, we Northerners want our fair share when it comes to investment. We want our Metrolink extensions in Manchester, just as we want our Supertram extensions in South Yorkshire. We are fed up of being typecast as the Cinderella regions of the UK, and it is about time the Government realised that there is a world beyond Watford.
Peter Simms, Barnsley, South Yorkshire
27/07/2004 at 23:20

Offensive or Inappropriate?

   I think it is a disgrace the way the government has acted over the Metrolink. The people of Greater Manchester lose out so in effect London can get a tram system that will cost B#2bn!! How much more are we going to waste in London? As if we haven't wasted enough on a big tent (Millenium Dome), the London Eye and what about the forever increasing costs of the National Football Stadium?! Manchester needs the Metrolink expansion, London didn't need the Millenium Dome or the London Eye. We want it for our regeneration and I won't be voting for Labour now anytime in the near future!
Steven Jarvis, Ardwick, Manchester
23/07/2004 at 22:56

Offensive or Inappropriate?

Newsletter Sign Up
 
Have your say Sign up to the weekly business
update

External links
 
The Jury
 

Should companies delay their attempts to go green if it means they can survive the economic crisis?

85%
15%